Everyone who thinks there are too many rigs on the roads, raise your hand. If today you used something that arrived on a truck, raise your other hand.
You can put both hands down.
Bill Graves, President of the ATA, has taken umbrage at some of the recent rhetoric in Washington. Not much love is being heard. Just “take trucks off the road.”
It must have hurt to read this sharpened lead in a recent Journal of Commerce cover story: “The Obama administration is forming a national freight transportation policy that can be boiled down to one concept: Get more trucks off the roads.”
In his April 30, 2010 letter to Secretary Ray LaHood Mr. Graves points to USDOT’s favorable references to, and funding of, intermodal rail and marine highway as ways to “take trucks off the road.” The Trucker-in-Chief disagrees.
Of course Secretary LaHood has good reason to point to rail and water. We all know intermodal rail is more fuel efficient than moving packages downhill on a Soap Box Derby special. (That’s the only image the RRs have yet to use in their non-stop ads.) So much more efficient that environmental organizations have become the railroads’ best advocates here in town.
And barges can carry even more tonnage on a whiff of what is in a locomotive’s fuel tank. Too bad far fewer people know it (although the barge industry is trying to do something about that).
There are great efficiencies to be realized in the rail and marine modes. Moving some truck loads to rail and water routes can be both good business and policy.
But here’s a shocker. Trucks aren’t going away. Not unless you want to have to trek down to the docks to pick up your new flat screen. Or to the farm to get your cabbage.
The “off the road” talk is shorthand. Not the full story. The policy talk doesn’t single out just trucks. It’s just that one doesn’t hear politicos say “take cars off the road” nearly as much. Yet that also is part of USDOT’s “livable community” message.
Under Secretary Roy Kienitz said in his March testimony about the TIGER-like National Infrastructure Investments program that it “focuses funding on investments in whichever modes are most effective in achieving our national transportation goals…”
The policy talk is about making the most of each of the modes. Using the modes where they are most efficient in moving the goods. Where possible make the long haul on rail much as trucking increasingly is hopping the freight…much as trucks will become customers of freight ferries and other coastal services. Maybe even become owners.
And notwithstanding some of the words used by short sea advocates, the marine highway effort is not about putting trucks and their drivers off the road and out of business. It’s about giving trucking logistics another route to take and an opportunity to rationalize operations.
Bill Graves is right to complain about glib “off the road” talk. There are better ways to describe the future role of trucks, water and rail in the national transportation system. Pbea