Questions of the Remotely Curious:
- Why should I care if Congress approves a WRDA bill…and what’s WRDA anyhow!
- So what if the surface transportation bill expires!
- What business does Washington have to do with the sewage treatment plant the county is trying to build!
- And why the hell does the Army Corps of Engineers have anything to say about clearing the muck from the marina where I keep my boat!
Yeah, and what’s the big deal about public works!
The average person who has no experience with government-at-work might be given a pass if he made such not-really questions. The average Federal elected official should be expected to know…or at least quickly learn…the answers.
Would it surprise you to learn that too many folks in Congress today don’t know and…judging by the rhetoric…may not care.
Over 200 persons were first sworn into House of Representatives membership in just the past four years. Many of them came to reside in Congress without prior legislative or other public office experience; many came with the intent to shrink government and cut spending. While those objectives are worthy of debate we are seeing in the fiscal brinksmanship and political gun play (“Call of Duty 6: Fiscal Warfare”?) how the give and take of real debate has been hard to come by here in Washington. (Consensus? Fugetaboutit.) New congressional Republicans, those of the Tea Party strain, have been a particular challenge for their Republican colleagues who came…well…to legislate.
Not too deeply into the last Congress Rep. John Mica (R-FL), then chair of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, came to publicly bemoan how a troubling number of freshman who were assigned to his committee had little interest in producing the aviation and surface transportation bills that were overdue for Hill attention. Mica publicly would cite the large number of legislative neophytes who–oddly–were poised to vote against the meat-and-potato policy and program of a public works committee. Why? Because they said they took the trip to Washington to gut government and its budget.
So it is to Chairman Mica’s credit that his committee eventually did produce the transportation authorization bills, albeit ones that didn’t adequately address the full cost of tackling the nation’s infrastructure needs.
Today, Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA) heads the committee. He faces the same challenge as his predecessor, Mica, and expectations as his father, Bud. From the get-go he identified his committee objectives, which include the first water resources bill (WRDA) since 2007 and a robust surface transportation reauthorization bill including possible funding initiatives to repair the failing revenue stream for the Highway Trust Fund.
The chairman knows a price tag comes with maintaining and improving American infrastructure but he is all too aware that for some in the House and Senate it is a price they may be unwilling to pay. So before Shuster rushes headlong into bill writing he wants his colleagues on the committee and in the House to learn why it is essential for Congress to take up these issues. He has been conducting “roundtable” sessions for his committee members so they may hear from trade associations and other public and private sector stakeholders. He convened a hearing with a 101 course title–The Federal Role in America’s Infrastructure—and a Peaceable Kingdom kind of witness list. And he has called on any and all persons who want to see transportation and infrastructure bills to get past third base to start their own education efforts on Capitol Hill.
Maybe, just maybe, the 113th Congress can be the did-something Congress.